Exploiting Zero-Days: APT34, APT28, and APT29 in Focus

Microsoft's January 2025 Patch Tuesday release addressed 159 vulnerabilities, including eight zero-day vulnerabilities, with three actively exploited in the wild.

Exploiting Zero-Days: APT34, APT28, and APT29 in Focus
the snowman looks lonely...

TL;DR

  1. APT34 (Cobalt Gypsy/Helix Kitten)

    • An Iranian cyber-espionage group known for exploiting Windows kernel vulnerabilities.
    • Targets sectors such as energy, telecommunications, and government.
  2. APT28 (Fancy Bear)

    • A Russian APT group with a history of exploiting elevation of privilege vulnerabilities.
    • Involved in cyber-espionage campaigns targeting government agencies and defense contractors.
  3. APT29 (Cozy Bear)

    • Another Russian APT group known for sophisticated cyber-espionage activities.
    • Targets include government agencies, critical infrastructure, and private sector organizations.
  4. Motivations

    • Espionage and intelligence gathering are the primary motivations behind these threat actors.
    • Targeting high-value sectors to gather sensitive information.
  5. Tactics

    • Exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access and elevate privileges.
    • Utilizing spear-phishing and social engineering techniques to deliver malicious payloads.
  6. Defense Strategies

    • Prioritize patching identified vulnerabilities and implement robust security measures.
    • Leverage threat intelligence to stay informed about the latest TTPs used by these groups.
  7. Continuous Monitoring

    • Implement continuous monitoring for suspicious activities and network anomalies.
    • Use multi-factor authentication and network segmentation to enhance security.

Research Summary

Microsoft's January 2025 Patch Tuesday release addressed 159 vulnerabilities, including eight zero-day vulnerabilities, with three actively exploited in the wild. These three zero-day vulnerabilities are related to Windows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP Elevation of Privilege, allowing an authenticated user to execute code with SYSTEM privileges. The vulnerabilities, identified as CVE-2025-21333, CVE-2025-21334, and CVE-2025-21335, were disclosed anonymously and are believed to have been exploited in the same attacks. This report investigates the named threat actors or intrusion sets likely exploiting these zero-day vulnerabilities, focusing on their historical context, motivations, and tactics.

The investigation reveals that the exploitation of these vulnerabilities is consistent with the tactics of several advanced persistent threat (APT) groups known for targeting critical infrastructure and high-value targets. Notably, APT34 (also known as Cobalt Gypsy or Helix Kitten), an Iranian cyber-espionage group, has a history of exploiting Windows kernel vulnerabilities. Additionally, Russian APT groups such as APT28 (Fancy Bear) and APT29 (Cozy Bear) have been known to exploit similar elevation of privilege vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to systems.

The motivations behind these threat actors are primarily espionage and intelligence gathering. APT34, for instance, has been active in targeting sectors such as energy, telecommunications, and government, aiming to gather sensitive information. Similarly, Russian APT groups have been involved in cyber-espionage campaigns targeting government agencies, defense contractors, and critical infrastructure.

To defend against these threat actors, organizations should prioritize patching the identified vulnerabilities and implement robust security measures such as network segmentation, multi-factor authentication, and continuous monitoring for suspicious activities. Additionally, leveraging threat intelligence to stay informed about the latest tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by these groups can enhance an organization's security posture.

Assessment Rating

Rating: HIGH

The assessment rating is HIGH due to the significant risk posed by the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure and high-value targets. The involvement of advanced persistent threat groups with sophisticated capabilities further elevates the threat level.

Attribution

Historical Context

The exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities by APT groups is a well-documented tactic used to gain unauthorized access and elevate privileges. APT34, APT28, and APT29 have a history of targeting critical infrastructure and high-value sectors for espionage and intelligence gathering.

Countries Targeted

  1. United States - High-value targets in government and critical infrastructure.
  2. United Kingdom - Government agencies and defense contractors.
  3. Germany - Industrial and critical infrastructure sectors.
  4. France - Telecommunications and energy sectors.
  5. Israel - Defense and technology sectors.

Sectors Targeted

  1. Government - Espionage and intelligence gathering.
  2. Energy - Targeting critical infrastructure.
  3. Telecommunications - Access to sensitive communications.
  4. Defense - Information on defense contractors and military operations.
  5. Technology - Intellectual property and technological advancements.

Motivation

The primary motivation behind these threat actors is espionage and intelligence gathering. They aim to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and disrupt critical infrastructure.

Attack Types

  • Elevation of Privilege: Exploiting vulnerabilities to gain SYSTEM privileges.
  • Remote Code Execution: Delivering malicious payloads to execute arbitrary code.
  • Information Disclosure: Accessing sensitive information through compromised systems.

Known Aliases

  1. APT34 (Cobalt Gypsy/Helix Kitten)
    • Iranian cyber-espionage group.
  2. APT28 (Fancy Bear)
    • Russian APT group.
  3. APT29 (Cozy Bear)
    • Russian APT group.
  1. APT33 (Elfin)

    • Another Iranian APT group with similar motivations and targets.
    • Known for cyber-espionage activities in the energy sector.
  2. APT41 (Double Dragon)

    • Chinese APT group with a history of exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities.
    • Targets include government, healthcare, and technology sectors.

Similar Threat Actor Groups

  1. APT33 (Elfin)

    • Similar motivations and targets as APT34.
    • Focus on cyber-espionage in the energy sector.
  2. APT41 (Double Dragon)

    • Similar tactics and techniques in exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities.
    • Targets include government, healthcare, and technology sectors.

Counter Strategies

  1. Patch Management

    • Prioritize patching identified vulnerabilities to prevent exploitation.
    • Implement automated patch management solutions.
  2. Network Segmentation

    • Segment networks to limit lateral movement of attackers.
    • Use firewalls and access controls to restrict unauthorized access.
  3. Multi-Factor Authentication

    • Implement multi-factor authentication to enhance security.
    • Use strong authentication methods for critical systems.

Forecast

Short-Term Forecast (3-6 months)

  1. Increased Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerabilities by APT34

    • Detailed analysis: APT34, also known as OilRig, has been actively exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities, including those in Windows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP. Recent reports indicate that APT34 has been targeting government and critical infrastructure sectors in the Middle East, leveraging these vulnerabilities to gain SYSTEM privileges and exfiltrate sensitive data. The group's focus on exploiting Microsoft Exchange servers and other critical systems suggests a continued emphasis on zero-day vulnerabilities.
    • Examples and references:
  2. Continued Cyber-Espionage Campaigns by APT28

  3. Increased Targeting of Critical Infrastructure by APT29

Long-Term Forecast (12-24 months)

  1. Evolution of Exploitation Techniques by APT34

  2. Increased Collaboration Among Russian APT Groups

  3. Proliferation of Custom Exploitation Tools by APT29

Future Considerations

Important Considerations

  1. Focus on APT34's Evolving Tactics

  2. Monitoring Collaboration Among Russian APT Groups

Less Important Considerations

  1. Focus on APT33's Activities

  2. Tracking APT41's Exploitation Techniques

    • Detailed analysis: APT41's history of exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities makes them a relevant threat actor to monitor. However, their focus on different sectors and regions makes them a less immediate concern compared to the primary threat actors identified in this report.
    • Examples and references:

Further Research

Breaches and Case Studies

  1. APT34 Exploitation of Windows Kernel Vulnerability - October 2024

    • Description: Iranian cyberspies exploited a Windows kernel vulnerability for espionage.
    • Actionable Takeaway: Implement robust patch management and continuous monitoring.
  2. APT28 Targeting Government Agencies - November 2024

    • Description: Russian APT group targeted government agencies for intelligence gathering.
    • Actionable Takeaway: Enhance security measures and leverage threat intelligence.

Followup Research Questions

  1. What are the specific TTPs used by APT34 in exploiting Windows kernel vulnerabilities?
  2. How can organizations enhance their patch management processes to prevent exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities?
  3. What are the latest threat intelligence reports on APT28 and APT29 activities?
  4. How can multi-factor authentication be effectively implemented in critical infrastructure sectors?

Recommendations, Actions and Next Steps

  1. Implement Robust Patch Management

    • Prioritize patching identified vulnerabilities and automate the process.
    • Regularly review and update patch management policies.
  2. Enhance Network Segmentation

    • Segment networks to limit lateral movement and restrict unauthorized access.
    • Use firewalls and access controls to enforce network segmentation.
  3. Leverage Threat Intelligence

    • Stay informed about the latest TTPs used by threat actors.
    • Integrate threat intelligence into security operations for proactive defense.
  4. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication

    • Use strong authentication methods for critical systems.
    • Regularly review and update authentication policies.

APPENDIX

References and Citations

  1. (2025-01-14) - Microsoft January 2025 Patch Tuesday fixes 8 zero-days, 159 flaws
  2. (2025-01-14) - Microsoft January 2025 Patch Tuesday - 159 Vulnerabilities Fixed, Including 10 Critical RCE's
  3. (2024-05-01) Microsoft Outlook Flaw Exploited by Russia's APT28 to Hack Czech, German Entities
  4. (2024-11-01) Russia-Aligned TAG-110 Targets Asia and Europe with HATVIBE and CHERRYSPY
  5. (2024-10-01) Iranian Cyber Group OilRig Targets Iraqi Government in Sophisticated Malware Attack
  6. (2024-05-01) Analyzing Forest Blizzard's custom post-compromise tool for exploiting CVE-2022-38028 to obtain credentials
  7. (2024-10-01) Iran's APT34 Abuses MS Exchange to Spy on Gulf Gov'ts
  8. (2024-05-08) Poland says Russian cyberspies targeted government networks

Mitre ATTACK TTPs

  1. T1068: Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
  2. T1078: Valid Accounts
  3. T1082: System Information Discovery
  4. T1105: Ingress Tool Transfer
  5. T1210: Exploitation of Remote Services

AlphaHunt

Get questions like this: which named threat actors or intrusion sets are likely exploiting these zero days?

Does it take a chunks out of your day? Would you rather be working on more interesting intelligence tasks? Would you like help with the research?

This baseline report was thoughtfully researched and took 5 minutes.. It's meant to be a rough draft for you to enhance with the unique insights that make you an invaluable analyst.

We just did the initial grunt work..

Are you ready to level up your skillset? Get Started Here!

Did this help you? Forward it to a friend!

(c) 2025 CSIRT Gadgets, LLC
License - CC BY-SA 4.0